Race Against the Machine: An Argument for the Standardization of Voting Technology
In this article/note, I examine a lingering question from the court cases arising out of the 2000 election: Does Bush v. Gore and the relevant equal protection case law open the door for a legal challenge to a state’s use of different voting machines/technologies and how do racial disparities in machine error rates impact this analysis? In addition to reviewing the current literature and case law on voting machine standardization, I also present an unrecognized and undocumented connection between the “all deliberate speed” order in Brown and the Court’s discussion of voting technology in Bush v. Gore.
Civil Rights and Discrimination | Constitutional Law | Internet Law | Law and Politics | Law and Society | Legislation
Date of this Version
Jason Belmont Conn, "Race Against the Machine: An Argument for the Standardization of Voting Technology" (July 16, 2005). bepress Legal Series. bepress Legal Series.Working Paper 667.