Foundations of Federalism: An Exchange
Our manuscript entitled "The Foundations of Federalism: An Exchange" is occasioned by the Supreme Court's federalism jurisprudence which, in our judgment, calls for a broad ranging exploration of the constitutional concept of federalism itself. That exploration takes place in the form of a dialog between us which, while rewritten from its original form, nevertheless reflects our actual exchanges over an 18 month period. Our conclusion is that such terms as "sovereignty" generally have no place in American constitutional federalism, that the Supreme Court's efforts to enforce federalism limitations have been ineffective and, in some instances, counterproductive, and most basically that federalism itself is best seen in non-theoretical terms, but instead as a practical and untidy system of occasions for sober second thought by federal and state governments engaged in the federal legislative process. On federal-state power conflicts, the Constitution should be seen as a purposeful "incompletely theorized agreement," to quote Cass Sunstein.
Administrative Law | Constitutional Law | Jurisprudence | Law and Politics | Law and Society | State and Local Government Law
Date of this Version
Randall P. Bezanson and Steven Moeller, "Foundations of Federalism: An Exchange" (May 25, 2006). bepress Legal Series. bepress Legal Series.Working Paper 1391.