Using Capture Theory and Chronology in Eminent Domain Proceedings
Capture theory--in which private purpose is substituted for government purpose--sheds light on a technique which is coming into greater use post-Kelo v. New London. That case affirmed that eminent domain use need only be rationally related to a legitimate government purpose. Capture theory focuses litigators' attention on "government purpose." That is a question of fact for the trier of fact. This article shows how to use civil discovery in order to show the Court that private purpose has been substituted for government purpose. If it has, the eminent domain use fails, because the use does not meet minimum scrutiny. This factual showing has very broad implications, because it can be used in any case of government action which relies on compliance with minimum scrutiny.
Administrative Law | Agency | Agriculture Law | Constitutional Law | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Economics | Energy and Utilities Law | Environmental Law | Evidence | Housing Law | Human Rights Law | Jurisprudence | Land Use Law | Law | Law and Economics | Law and Society | Litigation | Natural Resources Law | Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
Date of this Version
John H. Ryskamp, "Using Capture Theory and Chronology in Eminent Domain Proceedings" (May 2, 2006). bepress Legal Series. bepress Legal Series.Working Paper 1314.