Abstract
Research has shown that people vary widely in their support or opposition to progressive taxation. We argue here that the perception of progressiveness itself is affected by the nature of the tax system and by the way it is framed, or presented. Experiments conducted over the World-Wide Web and using within-subject design demonstrate that subjects suffer from a range of heuristics and biases in understanding and supporting progressive or redistributive taxation. After reviewing some prior results, we report three new studies. Two of them indicate that people do not sufficiently appreciate the reduction of progressiveness that results from the use of tax deductions to partly reimburse private expenditures. The third indicates that people do not fully appreciate the reduction in progressiveness that results from cuts in government services.
Disciplines
Economics
Date of this Version
April 2004
Recommended Citation
Jonathan Baron and Edward J. McCaffery, "Masking Redistribution (or its Absence)" (April 2004). University of Southern California Law and Economics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 1.
http://law.bepress.com/usclwps-lewps/art1