Title
Commitment versus Flexibility in Enforcement Games
Abstract
This paper studies the role of commitment in the design of enforcement mechanisms when enforcement can remedy harm from non-compliance. We consider a game between an enforcement authority ("enforcer") and an offender in which either the enforcer or the offender may act as a Stackelberg leader. The enforcer must choose whether to move first by committing to an enforcement strategy- thereby directly affecting the level of non-compliance; or rather let the offender make the first move- thereby calibrating the level of enforcement to the actual level of non-compliance. We show that the value of commitment to the enforcer depends on each player's responsiveness to a change in the other player's strategy choice. Commitment to an enforcement strategy is thus not always in the enforcer's interest.
Disciplines
Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Economics | Law and Economics | Law Enforcement and Corrections
Date of this Version
January 2011
Recommended Citation
Avraham D. Tabbach and Shmuel Leshem, "Commitment versus Flexibility in Enforcement Games" (January 2011). Tel Aviv University Law Faculty Papers. Working Paper 189.
http://law.bepress.com/taulwps/art189
This document is currently not available here.
Comments
JEL ClassiÂ…cation Numbers: C72, K42