Abstract
In 1861 John Stuart Mill published Considerations on Representative Government to discuss the justifications of democracy. The third chapter of this book explores why a government run by a good despot is unacceptable. In this article we revisit Mill's critique of the good despot to problematize the contemporary exercise of authority and influence by multinational companies especially in foreign countries. Inspired by Mill, we move away from the preoccupation of contemporary literature on privatization with the identity the actor (the question whether certain governmental functions must remain the province of public authorities) or the outcome of privatization (how it influences human rights or causes environmental damage) and shift attention to the democracy losses associated with the privatized decision-making process of the corporation. We identify the growing influence of private, particularly foreign actors, as a democratic problem of exclusion of persons from decision-making processes on issues with constitutive influence on their lives, and explore the different aspects of what we regard as an acute problem of democratic deficit.
Disciplines
Civil Rights and Discrimination | Constitutional Law | Courts | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Government Contracts | Human Rights Law | International Law | International Trade | Judges | Jurisprudence | Law | Law and Society | Politics | Public Law and Legal Theory
Date of this Version
2013
Recommended Citation
Eyal Benvenisti and Doreen Lustig, "The Multinational Corporation as “the Good Despot”: The Democratic Costs of Privatization in Global Settings" (January 2013). Tel Aviv University Law Faculty Papers. Working Paper 172.
http://law.bepress.com/taulwps/art172
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Government Contracts Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Commons, Judges Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Society Commons, Politics Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons