Compulsory Unionism as a Fraternal Conceit?
With the publication of Free Choice for Workers: a History of the Right to Work Movement, George Leef reexamines compulsory labor unions and to contest the justification offered in support of America’s labor laws. Leef’s perspective delegitimizes compulsory unionism on ethical and empirical grounds. Demonstrating that statutory compulsion fails to direct society toward progress, the book reveals that the road to serfdom can often be paved by bureaucratic regulation. Carefully examining history and contemporary events, this book contributes to the richly textured debate about the normative role of unions in a putatively free society. George Leef’s reassessment offers an essentially contractarian and liberal model of labor relations that rests on a vision of individual rights that have a clearly defined, independent existence predating society. From this perspective, George Leef specifies liberty as a desirable good in and of itself which is placed in harm’s way by progressive ideals and constructs. Far from operating as an anti-union document, Free Choice for Workers functions as a pro-union manuscript grounded in the conclusion that unions operate as defensible institutions and laudable associations, when and only if, they represent workers who join voluntarily.
Labor and Employment Law
Date of this Version
Harry G. Hutchison, "Compulsory Unionism as a Fraternal Conceit?" (July 13, 2006). bepress Legal Series. bepress Legal Series.Working Paper 1450.