The recent wave of corporate tax inversions has triggered interest in what motivates these tax-driven transactions now. Corporate executives have argued that inversions are explained by an “anti-competitive” U.S. tax environment, as evidenced by the federal corporate tax statutory rate, which is high by international standards, and by its “worldwide” tax base. This paper explains why this competitiveness narrative is largely fact-free, in part by using one recent articulation of that narrative (by Emerson Electric Co.’s former vice-chairman) as a case study.
The recent surge in interest in inversion transactions is explained primarily by U.S. based multinational firms’ increasingly desperate efforts to find a use for their stockpiles of offshore cash (now totaling around $1 trillion), and by a desire to “strip” income from the U.S. domestic tax base through intragroup interest payments to a new parent company located in a lower-taxed foreign jurisdiction. These motives play out against a backdrop of corporate existential despair over the political prospects for tax reform, or for a second “repatriation tax holiday” of the sort offered by Congress in 2004.
Accounting Law | Banking and Finance Law | Business Organizations Law | Law | Law and Economics | Public Law and Legal Theory | Taxation-Transnational | Tax Law
Date of this Version
Edward D. Kleinbard, ""Competitiveness" Has Nothing to Do With It" (September 2014). University of Southern California Legal Studies Working Paper Series. Working Paper 130.
Accounting Law Commons, Banking and Finance Law Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Taxation-Transnational Commons, Tax Law Commons