Shifts in Policy and Power: Calculating the Consequences of Increased Prosecutorial Power and Reduced Judicial Authority in Post 9/11 America
Forthcoming in the Widener Law Review
Among many responses to the attacks of September 11, 2001, Congress and the states have shifted to the executive branch certain powers once held by the judicial branch. This article considers the impact of transferring judicial powers to prosecutorial officers, and compares the consequent increased powers of the prosecutor with those powers traditionally held by prosecutors in Japanese criminal courts. It considers the impact of removing from public view and judicial oversight many prosecutorial functions, drawing comparisons between the largely opaque Japanese prosecutorial roles and those roles now assumed in immigration and anti-terrorism laws, noting the need for safeguards not currently in place in U.S. systems but shown to be highly effective in Japanese systems.
Administrative Law | Comparative and Foreign Law | Courts | Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Immigration Law | International Law | Judges | Law and Society | Public Law and Legal Theory | State and Local Government Law
Date of this Version
Chris McNeil, "Shifts in Policy and Power: Calculating the Consequences of Increased Prosecutorial Power and Reduced Judicial Authority in Post 9/11 America" (August 14, 2005). bepress Legal Series. bepress Legal Series.Working Paper 724.