The Limitations of Retirement Plan Law
It is widely believed that employers determine whether or not their employees receive retirement benefits and the type and amount of any benefits that are received. This belief is mistaken. While sponsorship of a retirement plan is a voluntary choice on the part of the sponsoring employer and the sponsoring employer directly controls the type of plan and the level of benefits provided, the employer's choices on these matters are controlled by its employees' preferences for different forms of compensation. An employer must spend the funds available for employee compensation so as to provide its employees with those forms of compensation that the employees value most highly. An employer includes retirement benefits in its employees' compensation packages when the employees prefer those benefits to other forms of compensation. In addition, in the long run, employees bear the costs of their retirement benefits. These facts mean that employees receive the retirement benefits that they want and are willing to pay for.
This conclusion undercuts the foundation of much of the law that regulates employees' retirement benefits, which includes the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") and portions of the Internal Revenue Code. In general, these laws are intended to enhance the quality of retirement benefits and to increase the levels of retirement benefits received by employees, particularly by nonhighly compensated employees. Retirement plan law attempts to accomplish these purposes by requiring that retirement benefits be provided on certain specified terms and to certain categories of employees. Mandatory enhancements in the quality of retirement benefits increase the costs of the benefits; since employees must pay for this enhanced quality, fewer employees, especially lower-paid employees, pay for and receive retirement benefits. Therefore, qualitative regulation of retirement benefits tends to restrict the benefits to higher-paid employees. Requirements that benefits be provided to employees who are unwilling to bear the costs of the benefits ultimately have the perverse effect of decreasing the retirement benefits of nonhighly compensated employees. In a voluntary retirement plan system, legal rules cannot compel employees to buy more and better retirement benefits than they want. ERISA and the retirement plan provisions of the Code tend to reduce the levels of retirement benefits received by employees generally and by nonhighly compensated employees in particular.
Labor and Employment Law | Law and Economics | Retirement Security Law | Taxation-Federal
Date of this Version
Peter M. van Zante, "The Limitations of Retirement Plan Law" (September 24, 2004). bepress Legal Series. bepress Legal Series.Working Paper 417.