Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr Antitrust Series

Series Home | Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr Home Page
 

Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP:

Robert Bell, WilmerHale
Lee Greenfield
Veronica Kayne
William Kolasky
Jim Lowe
Doug Melamed
Thomas Mueller
Ali Stoeppelwerth

Abstract

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important opinion concerning Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits monopolization and attempted monopolization. The opinion, written by Justice Scalia, limits the circumstances under which antitrust law will compel companies to assist their rivals.

Subject Area

Antitrust

Recommended Citation

Robert Bell, Lee Greenfield, Veronica Kayne, William Kolasky, Jim Lowe, Doug Melamed, Thomas Mueller, and Ali Stoeppelwerth, "Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP:" (January 2004). Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr Antitrust Series. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr Antitrust Series. Working Paper 36.
http://law.bepress.com/wilmer/papers/art36

No readers' reactions have been posted for this article. To submit one, copy the URL for this article (http://law.bepress.com/wilmer/papers/art36) and click here.