University of Virginia Legal Working Paper Series
University of Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series
Facts Do Matter: A Reply to Bagenstos
Abstract
This essay replies to critics of our earlier article reviewing efforts to apply psychological research on implicit bias to antidiscrimination law. We document that we do not hold the normative position ascribed to us by our leading critic, Professor Bagenstos, and that he misconstrued our scientific arguments and has accepted at face value empirically unsubstantiated claims about the power of millisecond-reaction-time measures to predict behavior in workplaces. Scholars, judges, regulators, and legislators who seek to combat the root causes of inequality effectively should attend carefully to the disputes surrounding the empirical assessment and theoretical modeling of implicit bias and consider the limits of existing data before using implicit bias research for theoretical, litigation or policy purposes.
Subject Area
Public Law and Legal Theory
Recommended Citation
Gregory Mitchell and P E. Tetlock,
"Facts Do Matter: A Reply to Bagenstos"
(February 2009).
University of Virginia Legal Working Paper Series.
University of Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series.
Working Paper 114.
http://law.bepress.com/uvalwps/uva_publiclaw/art114
No readers' reactions have been posted for this article. To submit one, copy the URL for this article (http://law.bepress.com/uvalwps/uva_publiclaw/art114) and click here.