University of Southern California

University of Southern California Law and Economics Working Paper Series

 

How Private Is Private Equity, and at What Cost?

James C. Spindler, University of Southern California Law School

Article comments

Forthcoming, 76 Univ. of Chicago L. Rev. 309 (2009)

Abstract

The literature on private equity ignores the impact of the securities laws. This is an oversight: key facets of private-equity structure (in particular, the limited control, liquidity, and information rights that are typical of limited partner investors) can be explained as an attempt to escape the reach of securities antifraud rules. The benefit of circumventing these rules is that doing so prevents the unwinding of optimal risk allocation between general and limited partners that would otherwise occur. This does, however, come at a significant cost, which is the exacerbation of agency costs between limited partner investors and the general partner manager; this necessitates the massive performance-based compensation that general partners receive, which is inefficient from a first-best perspective. Hence, reforming the securities laws would benefit not just public companies, but also private equity.

Subject Area

Banking and Finance, Corporations, Economics, Law and Economics, Secured Transactions, Securities Law

Recommended Citation

James C. Spindler, "How Private Is Private Equity, and at What Cost?" (May 2009). University of Southern California. University of Southern California Law and Economics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 96.
http://law.bepress.com/usclwps/lewps/art96

No readers' reactions have been posted for this article. To submit one, copy the URL for this article (http://law.bepress.com/usclwps/lewps/art96) and click here.