University of Southern California

University of Southern California Law and Economics Working Paper Series

 

Good Hybrids/Bad Hybrids

Edward J. McCaffery, USC and Caltech

Abstract

Hybrid income-consumption taxes seek to tax some but not all savings, the treatment of savings being the principal difference between an income and a consumption tax. Some hybrids, however, simply move the tax system towards a prepaid consumption or wage tax; others, by allowing arbitrage, risk making all taxation voluntary. A consistent, progressive postpaid consumption tax, in contrast, gets matters just right, by design: it allows ordinary savings, for times of retirement or medical or educational needs, to lower the burden of taxation, while falling on the yield to savings when it is used to elevate lifestyles. It is, in short, a good hybrid.

Subject Area

Taxation

Recommended Citation

Edward J. McCaffery, "Good Hybrids/Bad Hybrids" (November 2005). University of Southern California. University of Southern California Law and Economics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 34.
http://law.bepress.com/usclwps/lewps/art34

No readers' reactions have been posted for this article. To submit one, copy the URL for this article (http://law.bepress.com/usclwps/lewps/art34) and click here.