Children’s reasoning about disclosing adult transgressions: Effects of maltreatment, child age, and adult identity
299 4- to 9-year-old maltreated and non-maltreated children of comparable socioeconomic status and ethnicity judged whether children should or would disclose unspecified transgressions of adults (instigators) to other adults (recipients) in scenarios varying the identity of the instigator (stranger or parent), the identity of the recipient (parent, police, or teacher), and the severity of the transgression (“something really bad” or “something just a little bad”). By 4 to 5 years, children endorsed more disclosure against stranger than parent instigators, and less disclosure to teacher than parent and police recipients. The youngest maltreated children endorsed less disclosure than non-maltreated children, but the opposite was true among the oldest children. Older maltreated children distinguished less than non-maltreated children between parents and other types of instigators and recipients. The findings provide insight into children’s developing attitudes about adult transgression secrecy and how those attitudes may be shaped by adverse familial experiences.
Law and Psychology
Date of this Version
Thomas D. Lyon, Elizabeth A. Ahern, Lindsay A. Malloy, and Jodi A. Quas, "Children’s reasoning about disclosing adult transgressions: Effects of maltreatment, child age, and adult identity" (February 2010). University of Southern California Legal Studies Working Paper Series. Working Paper 60.
This document is currently not available here.