In 2011, France enacted a Corporate Board Quota to establish a forty percent floor for either sex on corporate boards. Existing literature presumes that women will change the way firms function and that their presence in upper management will improve both governance and financial returns. To assess the potential impact of the quota, we interviewed twenty-four current and former corporate board members. Our analysis of these interviews generates two findings. First our results indicate that, at least in the view of board members, the sex quota has had an impact on the process of board decision making, but adding women has not affected the substance of decision-making. Second, our findings suggest for the first time that adding women to a board may well have a substantive impact on decision making, not because of the sex of newly added member but because they more likely to be outsiders. French participants reported that newly added female members affected substantive decision making because they were more likely to be foreign, to be expert in a wider range of areas, and to be drawn from non-elite networks than their male counterparts.
Business Organizations Law | Commercial Law | Comparative and Foreign Law | International Law | Law | Law and Gender | Law and Society | Organizations Law | Public Law and Legal Theory
Date of this Version
Darren Rosenblum and Daria Roithmayr, "More Than a Woman: Insights into Corporate Governance after the French Sex Quota" (August 2014). University of Southern California Legal Studies Working Paper Series. Working Paper 131.
Business Organizations Law Commons, Commercial Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, Organizations Law Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons