University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series
Corporate Accountability and Triple Bottom Line Reporting: Determining the Material Issues for Disclosure
Article comments
This paper was included in the "Enhancing Corporate Accountability: Prospect and Challenges" Conference Proceedings (2006). This paper can also be referenced as [2007] UNSWLRS 15.
Abstract
The growth and interest in corporate accountability issues has in part stemmed from recurring examples of corporate irresponsibility. Voluntary efforts, have to date, been the overwhelming modus operandi chosen to ensure that companies assume appropriate responsibility and transparency for various human rights and environmental obligations. But such voluntary efforts can serve as precursors to binding formal rules and the emerging public reporting requirements of companies in select jurisdictions – mandating variations of triple bottom line reporting - indicate a willingness of some regulatory agencies to adopt a more expansive modern view of what issues are considered material to a corporation’s short and long term performance. However the principal issues of to whom and ‘social’ issues should be reported on are still far from resolved. The implementation and enforcement of these reporting requirements in the coming years will be a key indicator of the mainstreaming of the corporate responsibility agenda.
Subject Area
Corporations
Recommended Citation
Justine Nolan,
"Corporate Accountability and Triple Bottom Line Reporting: Determining the Material Issues for Disclosure"
(March 2007).
University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series.
University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series.
Working Paper 15.
http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps/art15
No readers' reactions have been posted for this article. To submit one, copy the URL for this article (http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps/art15) and click here.