Title
Abstract
Intense debate rages over the transparency and efficiency of investor-state arbitration. In contention is whether national courts should displace investment arbitration administered by the International Center for Investment Arbitration (ICSID). How this debate is resolved will significantly impact on states across the globe, their public interests and investors.
This manuscript scrutinizes this debate and recommends how to resolve it.
Disciplines
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | International Law | International Trade
Date of this Version
February 2012
Recommended Citation
Leon Trakman, "The ICSID Under Siege" (February 2012). University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series 2012. Working Paper 6.
http://law.bepress.com/unswwps-flrps12/art6
Included in
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Commons
Comments
This paper is to be published at Volume 45, No.3, Cornell International Law Journal (2012).This paper may be referenced as [2012]UNSWLRS 6.