Comments

This article was published in the Public Law Review (2010) 21 pp. 239-262. This paper may also be referenced as [2011] UNSWLRS 19.

Abstract

Four recent decisions concerning native title and land rights confirm that the approach of the High Court to statutory interpretation has become a focal point in defining the relationship between indigenous peoples and the wider Australian community. These recent decisions and the longer-range judicial development of Australian law on Indigenous property rights raises questions about the consistency with which traditional common law principles of interpretation have been applied. After more than three decades of statutory land rights in the Northern Territory, recent developments suggest a perhaps higher than suspected capacity for Australian law and politics to accommodate strong Aboriginal property rights and decision-making power. This raises questions whether the legal containment of native title by judges and politicians in the aftermath of Mabo (No 2) was an over-reaction to uncertainty and somewhat of a missed opportunity.

Disciplines

Law

Date of this Version

March 2011



Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS