Comments

This paper was published in the Australian Journal of Administrative Law, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 100, 2008. This paper may also be referenced as [2010] UNSWLRS 67.

Abstract

This article examines the state of the law of procedural fairness and procedural error, demonstrating that inadequacy of process is now central to findings that decisions of the Executive are so lacking in quality as to manifest an error of law. The article argues that fairness of outcome and legitimacy of review need not be defined only in relation to the faultlessness of process.

Disciplines

Administrative Law

Date of this Version

December 2010



Share

COinS