Abstract
After the absolute monarchy was replaced by the first constitution in 1932, the military and technocrats had made up Thai bureaucracy leaving little room for discussing stability of law and civil liberties. To date, there have been a number of military interventions as well as 18 constitutions (including the latest version in August 2007) as the ingredient of democratic regime for Thailand over the past 75 years. It is not surprising why it is commonly albeit wrongly perceived that the rule of law does not exist in the kingdom of Thailand.
The fact that Thailand’s constitutional government developed along in a different path from that of the Western world should not be solely used to sum up the absence of the rule of law. Instead, such fact should be drawn on as the starting point to illustrate how far the Thai Constitutions have learnt to embrace the rule of law for the country. Accordingly, the following study is set to prove whether Thailand does admire and advocate the constitutional governance where the laws and administrative procedures are designed to protect individual liberties, restrict the power of the state to infringe on individual rights, and hold leadership accountable to the public.
Disciplines
Constitutional Law
Date of this Version
July 2008
Recommended Citation
Pornsakol Panikabutara Coorey, "The evolution of the rule of law in Thailand: The Thai constitutions" (July 2008). University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series 2008. Working Paper 45.
http://law.bepress.com/unswwps-flrps08/art45
Comments
This paper was prepared for the 5th Asian Law Institute Conference, 22-23 May 2008, Singapore. This paper may also be referenced as [2008] UNSWLRS 45.