This submission responds to Part F of the ALRC’s 'Discussion Paper 72 - Review of Australian Privacy Law', September 2007 which deals with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and the promotion and enforcement of the Privacy Act 1988.
This submission argues that proposed improvements to Australian privacy principles will not be effective without major changes to Australia’s chronic under-enforcement of its current laws.
The reforms proposed by the ALRC will amount to a fundamental change in the complexion of the Australian legislation, from a system where dissatisfied complainants could never get past the ‘black hole’ of the Privacy Commissioner’s office, to one of a more normal legal regime of appeals, reported cases, and some real understanding of what the Act actually means emerging over time.
This submission supports the ALRC’s proposals but also identifies areas in which further improvements could be made. These include more discretion for the Privacy Commissioner to report publicy; express requirements for consultation with stakeholders on Codes, guidance and own-motion investigations; a complainant’s right to a Determination in more circumstances; and more prescriptive requirements for complaints reporting.
Consumer Protection Law | Cyberspace Law
Date of this Version
Graham Greenleaf, Nigel Waters, and Lee Bygrave, "Promoting and enforcing privacy principles: an analysis of the ALRC proposals for the role of the Privacy Commissioner" (April 2008). University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series 2008. Working Paper 23.