University of Michigan Legal Working Paper Series

Working Papers 2003-2010

 

Does Delaware Entrench Management?

Murali Jagannathan, State University of New York at Binghamton
Adam C. Pritchard, University of Michigan Law School

Abstract

Critics have charged that state competition in corporate law, which Delaware clearly dominates, leads to a “race to the bottom” promoting management entrenchment at shareholders’ expense. We present evidence here inconsistent with this hypothesis. Measures of director quality and governance mechanisms are higher in Delaware. Delaware’s directors hire higher quality CEOs and they are more likely to terminate CEOs. Tenures of Delaware directors and CEOs are both lower than their counterparts in other states. In addition, contrary to claims that anti-takeover laws promote management entrenchment, we find that states that provide the greatest anti-takeover protection – Ohio, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and Maryland – do not have significantly different turnover rates from California, the state that arguably offers the least anti-takeover protection.

Subject Area

Corporations, Organizations

Recommended Citation

Murali Jagannathan and Adam C. Pritchard, "Does Delaware Entrench Management?" (December 2008). University of Michigan Legal Working Paper Series. Working Papers 2003-2010. Working Paper 93.
http://law.bepress.com/umichlwps/olin/art93

No readers' reactions have been posted for this article. To submit one, copy the URL for this article (http://law.bepress.com/umichlwps/olin/art93) and click here.