University of Michigan Legal Working Paper Series
University of Michigan John M. Olin Center for Law & Economics Working Paper Series
Improving Criminal Jury Decision Making After the Blakely Revolution
Abstract
The shift in sentencing fact-finding responsibility triggered by Blakely v. Washington will dramatically change the complexity and type of questions that many juries will have to answer. Among the most important challenges confronting legislatures now debating the future of their sentencing regimes is whether juries are prepared to handle these new tasks effectively—and, if not, what can be done about it. The literature addressing Blakely and jury reform advocates have essentially ignored these questions—yet absent reform, a number of limitations on juror decision making seriously threaten the accuracy of verdicts and the fairness, effectiveness, and credibility of the criminal justice system. In this essay, we assess juries’ capacity to handle their new post-Blakely responsibilities, considering problems of cognitive overload, frustration and loss of motivation due to complex structures, difficulties evaluating certain kinds of evidence juries do not ordinarily consider, distortions due to the framing of non-binary questions, and deliberation-related biases, among others. We then propose a model for sentencing-stage jury proceedings that would minimize these problems. Its components include bifurcation of proceedings, partial application of the rules of evidence, formulation of special verdict forms in certain specific ways that will minimize framing effects, structural simplification of sentencing tasks, a more active jury, and guidance for jurors on bias-reducing deliberation structures.
Subject Area
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law and Procedure, Evidence, Law and Economics
Recommended Citation
JJ Prescott and Sonja Starr,
"Improving Criminal Jury Decision Making After the Blakely Revolution"
(June 2006).
University of Michigan Legal Working Paper Series.
University of Michigan John M. Olin Center for Law & Economics Working Paper Series.
Working Paper 39.
http://law.bepress.com/umichlwps/olin/art39
No readers' reactions have been posted for this article. To submit one, copy the URL for this article (http://law.bepress.com/umichlwps/olin/art39) and click here.