bepress Legal Repository

The Judge as a Fly on the Wall: Interpretive Lessons from the Positive Political Theory of Legislation

Daniel B. Rodriguez, University of San Diego
Cheryl Boudreau, University of California, San Diego
Arthur Lupia, University of Michigan
Mathew McCubbins, University of California, San Diego, Dept. of Political Science

Abstract

In the modern debate over statutory interpretation, scholars frequently talk past one another, arguing for one or another interpretive approach on the basis of competing, and frequently undertheorized, conceptions of legislative supremacy and political theory. For example, so-called new textualists insist that the plain meaning approach is compelled by the U.S. Constitution and rule of law values; by contrast, theorists counseling a more dynamic approach often reject the premise of legislative supremacy that is supposed by the textualist view. A key element missing, therefore, from the modern statutory interpretation debate is a conspicuous articulation of the positive and empirical premises underlying the normative theory of interpretation; and, in particular, an unclear portrait of the theory of lawmaking supporting the theory of interpretation.

In this paper, we consider statutory interpretation from the perspective of positive political theory (PPT) looking, first, at the best framework for understanding the relationship between duly authorized lawmakers and the judge/interpreters. We build upon the modern literature of communication theory to support the familiar view that a statute is best understood as an act of communication by the legislature to an audience. PPT helps us to draw various lessons for modern interpretation debates from this assumption. We consider several of these lessons in our paper, and we focus especially on the hoary debate over the use and utility of legislative history in construing ambiguous statutory language.

Subject Area

Administrative Law, General Law, Judges, Jurisdiction, Jurisprudence, Legislation, Public Law and Legal Theory

Recommended Citation

Daniel B. Rodriguez, Cheryl Boudreau, Arthur Lupia, and Mathew McCubbins, "The Judge as a Fly on the Wall: Interpretive Lessons from the Positive Political Theory of Legislation" (June 2005). University of San Diego Legal Working Paper Series. University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series. Working Paper 37.
http://law.bepress.com/sandiegolwps/pllt/art37

No readers' reactions have been posted for this article. To submit one, copy the URL for this article (http://law.bepress.com/sandiegolwps/pllt/art37) and click here.