Rutgers University (Newark) Legal Working Paper Series

Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers

 

The Conviction of Andrea Yates: A Narrative of Denial

Sherry F. Colb, Rutgers University School of Law-Newark

Abstract

This piece discusses the case of Andrea Yates, the woman who confessed to drowning her five children to death and was subsequently convicted of murder (though the conviction has since been overturned). In this piece, Colb contends that Andrea Yates was convicted because of the jurors’ emotional/psychological response to the possibility that post-partum psychosis could cause an otherwise decent person to commit such brutal acts. As a symptom of denial, Colb argues, the jury rejected the insanity defense and thereby reassured itself that only evil people could do what Yates did. If that were the case, then it would be fine to continue to ignore the issue of mental illness in general and its impact on post-partum women in particular.

Subject Area

Criminal Law and Procedure

Recommended Citation

Sherry F. Colb, "The Conviction of Andrea Yates: A Narrative of Denial" (July 2003). Rutgers University (Newark) Legal Working Paper Series. Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers. Working Paper 16.
http://law.bepress.com/rutgersnewarklwps/fp/art16

No readers' reactions have been posted for this article. To submit one, copy the URL for this article (http://law.bepress.com/rutgersnewarklwps/fp/art16) and click here.