<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>bepress Law Collection</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://law.bepress.com</link>
<description>Recent documents in bepress Law Collection</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:29:54 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	




<item>
<title>Charities for the Benefit of Employees: Why Trusts for the Benefit of Employees Fail the Public Benefit Test</title>
<link>http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art46</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art46</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:33:49 PST</pubDate>
<description>Charities are granted significant financial benefits through the exemption from income tax and deductibility of donations under the provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Act, 1997 (Cth). The concept of what is a charity or a charitable purpose which is a fundamental requirement of the income tax exemption is not defined in any taxation legislation and must be found in the common law.  The courts have concluded that a charitable purpose includes charities for the benefit and assistance of the sick.  An organization that has been established for the benefit of employees and former employees who are suffering work related illnesses would therefore have a charitable purpose.  There is however the further requirement that the entity's objectives must be for the benefit of the public.  This article analyses the requirement of public benefit for a charitable purpose as it relates to an entity established for the benefit of employees and former employees of a large corporation.  It discusses the rationale for the public benefit requirement and how the courts have applied this criterion to trusts for the benefit of employees and former employees.  In conclusion it examines alternative approaches to the current application of the public benefit test.</description>

<author>Fiona Martin</author>


<category>Taxation</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>The Story of TVA v. Hill: Congress Has the Last Word</title>
<link>http://law.bepress.com/usclwps/lss/art54</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://law.bepress.com/usclwps/lss/art54</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:40:37 PST</pubDate>
<description>TVA v. Hill, often noted for its importance in shaping environmental law, is also a key case in statutory interpretation law. The case involves the conflict between finishing the Tellico Dam and Reservoir, a project of the Tennessee Valley Authority that many characterized as pork barrel spending, and protecting the habitat of the rare snail darter fish. Although the Supreme Court's decision halted construction of the nearly finished dam, Congress subsequently passed legislation ordering completion of the reservoir project. Drawing on key legislative materials and judicial documents, Professor Garrett shows how this case illuminates the interactions among the three branches of government on a question of statutory interpretation. Participants in all branches of government were keenly aware of the involvement of the other governmental actors and made their decisions in light of expected reactions by others. This chapter traces the Tennessee Valley Authority's decision to build the Tellico Dam and the years of congressional attention to the project through the annual appropriations process; details the litigation brought to stop the dam by a law professor and his students; and analyzes legislative reactions to the Supreme Court decision interpreting the Endangered Species Act to protect the snail darter's habitat. The story of TVA v. Hill illustrates that, despite internal rules discouraging appropriations riders and the judicial canon disfavoring such provisions, Congress can achieve its purposes by passing a clearly worded provision within the text of annual appropriations bills.</description>

<author>Elizabeth Garrett</author>


<category>Environmental Law</category>

<category>Legislation</category>

<category>Politics</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Family Protection and Deportations or Removals: The Relevance of the Protection of Family Life for the Assessment of Deportations or Removals in Australia</title>
<link>http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art45</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art45</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:40:44 PST</pubDate>
<description>Obviously deportations or removals of persons, who have spent a certain period in Australia has tremendous impacts and consequences on their lives and most likely on the ones of their families as well. Therefore it is worth assessing how significant family related aspects are taken in the administrative decision-making process concerning deportations or removals.  The essay starts with a description of the domestic legal framework, to evaluate conditions under which such measures are legitimate. An overview on family protection in Australia presents the different sources of human rights together with its content and scope. More specifically the notion of family life for the assessment of the legality of deportations or removals is scrutinised by examining the compliance with international treaty obligations as well as the significance of citizenship. Finally, two relevant General Directions (GD), given by the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship and providing guidelines, are assessed in the context of sufficient safeguards for family life.</description>

<author>Gregor Heissl</author>


<category>Criminal Law and Procedure</category>

<category>Human Rights Law</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>The protection of human rights in NSW through the Parliamentary process - a review of the recent performance of the NSW Parliament&apos;s Legislation Review Committee</title>
<link>http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art44</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art44</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:06:27 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The NSW Parliament's Legislation Review Committee was established on the recommendation of a Parliamentary inquiry into the desirability of a bill of rights of rights for New South Wales. While the inquiry found that Parliament had not always fully observed human rights standards, it saw improved legislative scrutiny of bills as a more appropriate response than the enactment of a bill of rights. This paper examines a number of aspects of the Committee's recent work in order to ascertain whether under its traditional common law scrutiny mandate the Committee consistently examines draft legislation in the light of the international human rights norms by which Australia is bound. It concludes that the Committee does reasonably well in identifying classical civil liberties concerns, though it tends not to apply a rigorous human rights analysis to these rights. On the other hand, notwithstanding its broad interpretation of its mandate, the Committee has done less well in relation to the identification and analysis of other rights, in particular in relation to economic, social and cultural rights. The paper argues that even with enhanced Parliamentary scrutiny, the adoption of a bill of rights would make a difference, as it would provide a clear and comprehensive set of standards and a framework for full human rights analysis, while the prospect of even soft judicial review would focus the minds of policymakers and legislators on human rights issues in the legislative process.</description>

<author>Andrew Byrnes</author>


<category>Human Rights Law</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Problems of High Seas Governance</title>
<link>http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art43</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art43</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:48:29 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The high seas cover more than 50% of the planet's surface. The last thirty years have seen unparalleled expansion of human activities and impacts on the oceans and on the high seas in particular. At the same time there is evidence of the impacts of the increased intensity of existing human activities; increases in maritime transportation, marine pollution, particularly from land based sources, such as garbage, as well as traditional fishing techniques. These issues, which affect waters both inside and outside national jurisdiction, pose governance issues. This chapter seeks to set out the key risks that high seas areas face, the plethora of bodies with regional and sectoral jurisdiction but also the lacunae - the regulatory and governance gaps that exist.</description>

<author>David Freestone</author>


<category>International Law</category>

<category>Law of the Sea</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>The Price of Admission: Who gets into private school, and how much do they pay?</title>
<link>http://law.bepress.com/usclwps/lewps/art108</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://law.bepress.com/usclwps/lewps/art108</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:48:46 PDT</pubDate>
<description>This paper uses mechanism design theory to analyze how elementary and secondary private schools decide which students to admit from their applicant pool when wealth is private information. The problem for an individual private school of who to admit and how much to charge in tuition, is complicated by the existence of peer-effects: the value students place on attending school is increasing with the average ability of the entire class at that school. This feature, coupled with the fact that students can always attend public school for free, places constraints on the types of classes the private school can admit. An incentive compatible allocation rule which admits only high ability students violates the private school's operating constraint, while an allocation rule which admits only on the basis of wealth violates student participation constraints. Recognizing the costs associated with verifying wealth type can assist in explaining the structure of tuition contracts between students and private schools.</description>

<author>Nina Walton</author>


<category>Economics</category>

<category>Education Law</category>

<category>Law and Economics</category>

<category>Law and Society</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Multiple punishments: the detention and removal of convicted non-citizens</title>
<link>http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art42</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art42</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:37:45 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Under the Migration Act, being imprisoned for a criminal offence can constitute grounds for visa cancellation, even for people who have spent most of their lives in Australia. 'Non-citizens' who have had their visas cancelled in this way are liable to detention on completion of their prison sentence; form a significant proportion of the current immigration detainee population and are routinely deported. This paper examines the punitive implications of this policy including: its impact on the parole process; the institutionalisation of double punishment; and the multiple mechanisms of disempowerment operating through the detention regime.  While this is still work in progress, the paper argues that criminal convictions do not justify detention and removal, and suggests a framework for future research.</description>

<author>Michael Grewcock</author>


<category>Criminal Law and Procedure</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Trade and Equality: A Relationship to Discover</title>
<link>http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art41</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art41</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:48:10 PDT</pubDate>
<description>There is conspicuous inequality among World Trade Organisation (WTO) member countries. WTO law has responded to this by creating a set of rules (Special and Differential Treatment or S&amp;DT) which permit specially favorable trading treatment to support the participation of developing countries, even though equality of treatment is a central principle and objective of WTO law. Yet, it is widely agreed that S&amp;DT has not succeeded in its aim of advancing trade equality. Insight into the reasons for this relative failure may be drawn from another body of international law which has equality as a core principle and objective and which also permits special treatment, human rights equality law. Analyzing commonly identified flaws in S&amp;DT from the perspective of the theoretical, conceptual and strategic framework of human rights equality law enables the flaws to be understood more deeply. It also offers a new perspective on the impasse which has been reached in the Doha Round of multilateral trade negotiations and provides robust guidance as to how S&amp;DT may be made stronger, more effective and more operational.</description>

<author>Gillian Moon</author>


<category>General Law</category>

<category>Human Rights Law</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Foucault, anti-humanism and human rights</title>
<link>http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art40</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art40</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:39:38 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Responding to recent engagements with Foucault, and in part to the provocation of this conference (' antifoundational humanism '), this paper argues that in his late work Foucault does not submit to the 'moral superiority' of humanism and introduce a liberal humanist subject. Rather, Foucault's late investigations of subjectivity constitute a continuation and not a radical departure from his earlier positions on the subject. Such a reading helps us to assess Foucault's late supposed 'embrace' of, or return to, human rights - which is here re-interpreted as a critical anti-humanist engagement with human rights, conducted in the name of an unfinished humanity. In this way, the paper engages not only with the way in which mainstream accounts of human rights tend to assimilate anti-foundational and post-structural challenges, but also with the quality of Foucault's own political legacy and future in the age of human rights, 25 years on.</description>

<author>Ben Golder</author>


<category>General Law</category>

<category>Human Rights Law</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>The International Climate Change Legal and Institutional Framework: An Overview</title>
<link>http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art39</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://law.bepress.com/unswwps/flrps09/art39</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:01:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In December 2009 the Parties to the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) will meet at the 15th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP) in Copenhagen to agree the fundamental principles of the legal regime that will apply post 2012. This chapter provides an overview of the complex regime established by the Convention, the processes leading up to the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol and key implementation challenges it has experienced. It introduces some of the key processes and institutions and describes some of the key concepts that will be further developed in later chapters. It also discusses briefly the explosive growth of carbon trading and the challenges faced by the UNFCCC parties at Copenhagen.</description>

<author>David Freestone</author>


<category>Environmental Law</category>

<category>International Law</category>

</item>



</channel>
</rss>
