Northwestern Law Legal Working Paper Series

Law and Economics Papers

 

Counting Guns in Early America

James T. Lindgren, Northwestern University School of Law
Justin Lee Heather, Northwestern University School of Law

Abstract

The picture of gun ownership that emerges from these analyses directly contradicts the assertions of Michael Bellesiles in Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture (2000). Contrary to Arming America's claims about probate inventories in 17th and 18th century America, there were high numbers of guns, guns were much more common than swords or other edge weapons, women in 1774 owned guns at rates (18%) higher than Bellesiles claimed men did in 1765-90 (14.7%), and 83-91% of gun-owning estates listed at least one gun that was not old or broken. The authors replicated all the portions of Bellesiles' published study where he both counted guns in probate inventories and cited sources containing inventories. They conclude that Bellesiles appears to have substantially misrecorded or misremembered the 17th and 18th century probate data he presents.

Recommended Citation

James T. Lindgren and Justin Lee Heather, "Counting Guns in Early America" (June 2001). Northwestern Law Legal Working Paper Series. Law and Economics Papers. Working Paper 42.
http://law.bepress.com/nwwps/lep/art42

No readers' reactions have been posted for this article. To submit one, copy the URL for this article (http://law.bepress.com/nwwps/lep/art42) and click here.